Underperforming Locations
When one store is quietly dragging the rest down, averages hide the truth — until the damage is obvious.
Do You Have "Good" Results… but a Bad Feeling?
Multi-location operators often see stable company-level numbers while one or two locations quietly bleed margin, waste labor, or underperform on pricing and throughput.
The risk isn't just that one store is weaker — it's that leadership makes decisions based on averages and misses where the real problem is.
Why Underperformance Is Hard to Spot
Underperforming locations get masked by:
- Company-wide averages hiding location-level variation
- Seasonality, promotions, or one-off events creating false signals
- Different staffing patterns making comparisons feel "unfair"
- Inconsistent reporting that makes leaders distrust the numbers
The result: teams react late — and often fix the wrong thing first.
What Keystone Does Differently
We don't just point out which location is underperforming. We identify why — and what the highest-leverage fix is.
Our goal is clarity you can act on: what changed, what's structural, and what to do next.
Our Location Performance Process
Who This Is For
Good Fit
- 2+ locations with noticeable performance variation
- Leadership needs clarity on where to focus
- You want root cause, not just reporting
Not a Fit
- Single-location businesses
- Those wanting generic benchmarking only
- Companies not willing to act on the findings

